Monty Python VS The Holy Grail

Having recently seen Monty Python and the Holy Grail for the first time because of my English seminar, I thought I'd compare the two items; the comedic movie and the actual epic tale of Sir Galahad in his quest to find the cup Jesus Christ held at the Last Supper with his twelve apostles.

For a low-budget film, I have to say Monty Python is a good movie. My favourite scene, and I'm sure many people will agree, is when Arthur confronts the Black Knight. They fight, and the opposing knight loses an arm. 'Tis but a scratch, he says, and continues the fight. He eventually ends up with neither his arms nor his legs. Hilarious.

In fairness, the quest doesn't really go anywhere in the movie. They trot around on their make-believe horses ( the budget was too skimpy for real ones) and generally just face off against various challenges that they mainly run away from. In the end, the quest is left unfulfilled, but I won't say how it ends. I've probably said too much already...oh dear.

The tale of Sir Galahad and the quest for the Holy Grail is very lyrical and full of religious scenes. It constantly refers to Sir Galahad as pure and pious, as he is a virgin and therefore pure and worthy to find the Holy Grail. On his journey with his less-than-worthy-but-still-on-the-quest-knights, he travels around the country, meeting old men who have been waiting for the virgin knight so that they can expire. By simply meeting and touching Galahad, they die. What a wonderful, fulfilling quest God sent Galahad on!

The tale of the Holy Grail is full of visions and communion scenes that really give the intense religious significance of the story. Visitations by angels and possibly Christ Himself feature in the tale. It really is THIS IS RELIGIOUS AND HOLY AND JUST AND WE ARE DOING IT!!! The knights get distracted by ruling a kingdom for a few years, and it is prophesied that not all the knights will see the Grail found. It ends with just Sir Bors, one of the knights on the quest and Lancelot's cousin, returning to Camelot alone and retelling the story for all to hear.

Both forms of textual transmission are good, and make the best use of what they had at the time. The tale is well-written, even if it does wander off like most epic tales. The movie is good for its small budget, and I'd recommend both to anyone.